Still Life – Dutch word ‘Still-leven’ meaning motionless natural object or objects
The Dutch Golden Age of painting began around the 17th century, with artists like Jan Brueghel the Elder and Pieter Claesz painting detailed and intricate Still Life’s. The painting by Pieter Claesz below (left) is super realistic and has this cast of light emphasizing the skull, which symbolizes the shortness of life – known as the ‘Vanitas’ theme, a lot of the paintings had hidden meanings within them.
The painting by Jan Brueghel the Elder below (right) depicts flowers that in reality would never bloom together all at the same time, it would mean that the paintings flowers could be enjoyed all year round. These beautiful and impressive arrangements would show off both the artists skill and the collectors wealth.
Following on from the 17th century, the 18th century continued with this format of ideas, but with floral decoration moving on to fabric, porcelain and wallpaper, this was part of the Rococo/ Late Baroque movement and was a style in which French artists became the influencers. This period saw ‘Still Life’s’ as becoming a genre itself and moving on from the hidden allegories of mortality or vanitas. France would become the hub for painting right up until after World War II and the Non-objective artwork.
The painting below (left) is by the artist Anne Vallayer-Coster and depicts a kitchen table with fish and glassware. She has captured the highlights on the glass and the luminescent sheen on the fish perfectly and yet ‘Still Life’ was considered the least technically challenging at the time.
Anne Vallayer-Coster was hugely influenced by Jean Baptiste-Simeon Chardin who was considered a master of ‘Still Life’ and was known for his Impasto paint technique and soft diffusion of light. In the painting below (right) you can see the heavy brush strokes and the clever use of highlighting and shade, as if every surface was thoroughly thought about and the soft velvety texture of the peaches can almost be felt.
With the 19th century ‘Still Life’ came back in favour, with ‘Impressionism’ and ‘Post-Impressionism’ making technique and colour more important than subject matter.
Edouard Manet used loose brush strokes and tone to paint this ‘Carnations and Clematis in a Crystal Vase’ painting below (left). Transitioning from realism to impressionism ‘Still Life’ would become more focused on depiction of light, movement and mood, using contrasting or complementary colours. I also looked at the work of Paul Gauguin I liked the vibrant colours of the ‘Still life with teapot and fruits’ (below right) and although the items appear flat and without any sense of depth, I think it helps to focus the attention more to the pattern and texture of the paint application.
The 20th century saw several art trends including Expressionism, Fauvism, Cubism and Surrealism to name a few. A group of artists named the ‘Les Nabis’ were involved in the move of Impression and academic art to abstract, symbolism and modernism. Odilon Redon was one of the artists involved in this movement, he would use symbolism to convey his feelings and his own imagination to portray form. I liked the still life of Flowers below (top left) for its simple background and soft appearance.
Still life had some what of a revival with the colourful and bold paintings of Fauvism and the fragmented and abstract paintings of Cubism. The artist Henri Matisse has created this beautifully bold still life (bottom left) using complementary colours to enhance the brightness of the painting. Pablo Picasso was known for co-founding the Cubist movement, where objects or figures were deconstructed and put back together in a fragmented and distorted way, creating a new reality. He did a series of guitar paintings exploring different media and different concepts. The guitar series was thought to have been the start of Synthetic Cubism in which items were painted in bolder colours and would include using different materials to make collages. I liked the painting below because even though there is no sense of depth to items, they still manage to stand out with the clever use of contrast and colour.
Contemporary Still Life hasn’t changed that much from earlier works, in a way that what is needed to make a ‘Still Life’ is still relatively the same. You would still apply light and shadows, composition and the application of colour, shading and texture. It has however evolved with media, with the use of photography or video. The still life below is just like a painting from the 17th century, with the lighting and flowers all replicated. Sharon core’s photograph has captured the flowers at the peak of their life, but the voyeur knows that the flowers will soon whither and die. It helps to remind you that life is short and we must lead good and fulfilling lives.

The second still life is by Ori Gersht and depicts a floral arrangement being blown up, while being caught on film. The artist has taken the calm of a ‘still life’ arrangement and the violence of the explosion and perhaps used them as a visual representation of the conflicts going on in his homeland of Israel. (link below)
Sources
Websites
Pinterest
Wikipedia
Britannica
Tate
Articles
https://www.theguardian.com/culture/gallery/2013/oct/19/10-best-contemporary-still-lifes
Books
Movements in Painting – By Patricia Fride-Carrassat & Isabelle Marcade